Outrageous Predictions
Executive Summary: Outrageous Predictions 2026
Saxo Group
A few years ago, artificial intelligence sounded futuristic. Today, it has moved into financial markets, enterprise software, logistics, consumer electronics, healthcare, and many sectors of the economy. Some companies are integrating AI into existing operations, while others are adapting products, business models, and investment strategies around it.
Investors have taken notice. Some AI-related stocks have risen sharply in recent years, though performance has varied by company and period. Also, several large technology companies have increased capital expenditures on AI infrastructure and model development. Last but not least, AI startups have attracted significant funding, while governments and regulators are still developing policy responses to this rapid shift.
Despite the excitement, the long-term viability of investing in artificial intelligence remains a complex question. Some companies may dominate, while others struggle to justify their valuations. Ethical and data privacy concerns, as well as geopolitical tensions, also add layers of risk that investors cannot ignore.
Note: Investing in AI-related companies or funds involves risk. Share prices can fall as well as rise, valuations can change quickly, and returns are not guaranteed.
AI has transitioned from a niche technological interest to a major focus in both public and private markets, contributing to capital shifts over the past decade. From foundational model developers to cloud infrastructure providers, several parts of the digital economy are being assessed through the lens of artificial intelligence investing.
Private investment in artificial intelligence has increased in recent years, including investment in generative AI. Funding levels vary by region, sector and time period. Examples of prominent generative AI developers include OpenAI, xAI and Anthropic, mentioned for context only and not as investment recommendations.
AI investment trends have also affected public markets, but performance has varied widely across companies and periods. Some large companies associated with AI, including Nvidia, Microsoft and Amazon, have experienced strong share-price gains in some periods, supported by expectations around AI chips, cloud computing services, and enterprise AI adoption. For instance, Nvidia's market value surpassed USD 1 trillion in 2023. However, market values fluctuate, and this should not be treated as a forward-looking indicator. Venture capital has also continued to support startups developing AI models, infrastructure, and applications, although funding conditions and company outcomes vary.
Market growth expectations are one driver of investor interest. Some forecasts estimate substantial growth in the global AI market by 2030, but projections vary widely by source, definition and methodology. Demand for data centre capacity, computing power and skilled AI talent may continue to attract investor interest, but this depends on valuations, adoption, competition and funding conditions.
As a result, artificial intelligence is increasingly discussed as an investment theme across several industries, rather than only within the technology sector. Thematic portfolios, AI-focused ETFs, and index-tracking products can now provide exposure to this fast-moving and competitive landscape, depending on their holdings, costs and concentration.
AI is no longer a niche subsector of tech. It is embedded across infrastructure, hardware, software, and services, shaping the investment landscape far beyond Silicon Valley. For investors evaluating how to gain exposure, there are several pathways.
Some of the highest-profile areas of exposure are listed companies involved in core AI innovation or affected by AI integration.
These include AI hardware manufacturers and firms that offer cloud-based services, custom chips, and language model development. Other major players in the space include tech companies that embed generative AI into search, productivity, and user-facing products, as well as organisations that leverage AI to optimise workflows, security, and content creation.
Investors are also paying attention to AI chipmakers and networking companies, where demand has increased in some areas due to AI infrastructure requirements.
Examples of widely discussed public companies with AI exposure (for illustration only and not as investment recommendations) include:
For those seeking broader exposure, AI ETFs and thematic funds may offer diversified entry points, depending on their holdings and concentration. These portfolios may reduce company-specific risk compared with holding one stock, but they can still be concentrated and volatile.
Other funds also track indices focused on AI-adjacent technologies, such as semiconductors, automation, or cloud computing, which may reduce single-company risk but remain volatile.
While the public markets reflect the strong position of several large technology firms, private investment also supports AI startups. Companies building specialised LLMs, vertical AI tools (e.g., legaltech, medical diagnostics), or edge AI solutions have raised billions in venture capital.
Some of these challengers develop open-source or fine-tuned models that compete with those of larger companies such as Google and Meta.
For most investors, exposure to these firms is limited to indirect routes (e.g., VC-backed IPOs or through holdings in larger companies that acquire or partner with these startups). However, their progress can influence how investors assess the valuations and strategies of public AI stocks.
Investing in artificial intelligence requires looking across the AI stack, from data centres and chipmakers to software platforms and enterprise users. No single segment captures the full set of opportunities. Diversifying across infrastructure, model development, and applied AI could help you spread exposure, but it does not eliminate volatility or guarantee long-term outcomes.
The rise of AI has triggered investor interest, but assessing companies requires more than just recognising brand names or recent share price gains.
Key factors include:
AI products often benefit from strong economies of scale. Language models, once trained, can be repurposed across platforms and industries. However, training large models requires immense capital expenditure and computing power. One factor is whether a company can scale cost-effectively, either through proprietary infrastructure or partnerships that reduce marginal deployment costs.
Access to relevant, high-quality datasets can be an important differentiator, as AI systems often perform better when trained on suitable data. Companies with exclusive datasets, such as healthcare firms with anonymised patient records or financial institutions with real-time transaction flows, may have a structural advantage if that data can be used lawfully and effectively. This data edge could make their AI offerings harder to replicate.
Not all AI solutions are equal. Some firms embed AI into existing tools to improve user experience, while others build AI-native platforms that offer entirely new services. A clear product roadmap, strong user engagement, and defensible IP, such as model architecture or deployment infrastructure, may support a company’s competitive position.
Many AI startups attract attention with impressive demos and early adoption, but long-term viability depends on sustained revenue growth. For AI companies, monetisation can be assessed through factors such as subscriptions, usage-based pricing, enterprise integrations, or licensing. Clear pricing tiers, customer retention and recurring revenue may indicate a more developed monetisation model.
With AI markets evolving rapidly, execution matters. Relevant questions include whether the company ships updates regularly, whether R&D translates into customer adoption, and whether partnerships expand its market reach. Earnings reports, user growth metrics and product releases may provide signals of execution.
AI companies' role in the ecosystem (model builder, infrastructure provider, platform integrator, or application developer) affects their growth ceiling and margin profile. One factor is whether a firm appears to lead in its segment or faces pressure from larger, more integrated players.
Investing in artificial intelligence isn't just about growth potential anymore. Ethical risks are now front and centre for investors who care about long-term value and impact. Here are the main issues to watch closely:
AI systems often learn from real-world data, but that data isn't always fair. If the training data includes past inequalities or imbalances, the AI can repeat them in ways that hurt people. This includes hiring tools that prefer one demographic over another or healthcare models that don't work well for specific populations. Investors may consider whether companies have built-in checks, such as independent audits or teams focused on responsible AI.
AI systems frequently rely on large-scale data collection. This raises significant concerns around data misuse, surveillance, and consent, particularly in sectors like retail, advertising, and biometric recognition. Poor data governance practices can lead to legal liability, reputational damage, and regulatory fines. Investors may consider whether firms comply with the GDPR, the CCPA, or other major data protection frameworks.
Many AI systems learn by analysing content scraped from the internet, such as books, code, music, or news articles. But that raises big questions: was the data used legally? Could the AI generate something that violates someone else's rights? Companies being sued over this are already making headlines. Some investors may prefer firms that are transparent about training data and licensing, although this does not remove legal or commercial risk.
Some AI systems can be difficult to interpret, making it harder to explain how decisions are reached. That's a problem when they're used in areas like healthcare, lending, or law enforcement. Investors may consider companies that explain how their AI works, allow third-party checks, or openly share parts of their technology.
AI can require significant computing power, increasing energy use. Training and running large AI models can be energy-intensive and may have material environmental impacts, depending on model size, hardware efficiency and the electricity mix. Investors who care about sustainability may check whether companies use efficient systems, rely on lower-carbon electricity sources, or have carbon-offset policies.
Some AI tools are used for surveillance, predictive policing, or even autonomous weapons. These 'dual-use' cases may raise red flags for investors focused on ethical governance. A relevant factor is whether the company has clear policies on how its AI can and can't be used.
Artificial intelligence is reshaping the job market. Some roles are being streamlined or eliminated, while others are evolving. For investors, this shift presents both a business and a reputational risk.
AI-led automation can affect jobs that involve routine, repetitive work. Manufacturing, logistics, customer support, and admin roles are increasingly handled by robotics, chatbots, and workflow automation. In finance, tasks like compliance checks and basic reporting are now partly automated, reducing the need for certain back-office functions.
Creative and professional jobs are also feeling the impact. AI tools can write code, generate marketing content, review legal documents, and assist in medical diagnostics. While these tools boost efficiency, they also lower the demand for entry-level roles in design, media, law, and healthcare.
But not all effects are negative. AI is also creating new roles in data management, model oversight, and technical operations. Many companies are reshaping their teams, not just shrinking them.
Governments are watching closely. Policy responses are evolving and may include measures such as AI risk assessments or retraining incentives, depending on the jurisdiction. As public concern grows, companies that automate without supporting workers may face regulatory pressure or reputational fallout.
For investors, the key question is whether companies are handling workforce changes responsibly. Long-term outcomes may depend on cost savings, implementation quality, workforce management, regulation and reputational risk.
AI is a major theme in global markets, but it also brings risks that investors need to understand before allocating capital. Here are the main ones:
1. Valuation and sentiment riskSome AI-related stocks have seen dramatic price increases, particularly in semiconductors, cloud infrastructure, and automation software. But many of these gains are driven by future expectations rather than current earnings. This creates exposure to sharp corrections if investor sentiment cools down, earnings disappoint, or interest rates rise. Heavy exposure to the most popular AI stocks can make a portfolio more volatile.
2. Changing rules and regulations
Governments around the world are still figuring out how to manage AI. New rules about privacy, safety, fairness, or how data is used could change how companies operate. If a company doesn't follow the rules or can't adapt quickly, it could face fines, delays, or negative headlines. Since different countries have different rules, global AI companies may face extra challenges.
3. Execution riskNot every company marketing itself as "AI-driven" has viable, scalable solutions. Some firms struggle to move from research and prototypes to real-world applications that generate sustainable revenue. Business models can break down if integration costs run too high or if customers are slow to adopt. Investors may need to assess not just the technology, but its actual commercial impact and user traction.
4. Relying too much on a few providersMany AI companies depend on the same big players for chips, cloud services, or key technology. If one of those providers raises prices, cuts access, or faces political problems, it can affect many smaller companies at once. This kind of dependence can create hidden risks.
5. Data dependency and model risk
AI systems are only as good as the data they're trained on. Poor data quality, outdated inputs, or biased datasets can lead to flawed outcomes, reputational damage, or regulatory pushback. Additionally, model performance can degrade over time ("model drift") or fail under unexpected market or user behavior. This adds a layer of unpredictability to long-term value creation.
6. Talent scarcity and operational bottlenecks
Advanced AI development requires highly specialised talent, which remains limited and expensive. Companies that can't recruit or retain top engineers and researchers may fall behind in innovation or face execution gaps. This risk is particularly acute for smaller or non-core tech firms trying to compete in a field dominated by tech giants.
Some AI-linked stocks have delivered strong returns, but gains have been concentrated, and valuations can change quickly.
One approach some investors consider is spreading exposure across different parts of the AI value chain, such as chips, cloud, enterprise software and industry-specific applications, while checking concentration risk. ETFs may help spread exposure, but some are heavily weighted toward a small number of companies.
It’s wise to remember that not every company using AI will generate durable growth, so fundamentals such as monetisation, customer retention and capital efficiency remain important. AI exposure remains a widely discussed investment theme, but valuations, competition and regulation make outcomes uncertain.
AI in defence and national security: What investors should know
AI, robotics & blockchain: Key investment considerations