Tesla after SpaceX: one Musk, two market stories

Key takeaways

• SpaceX gives investors a new public way to buy the Elon Musk growth story.

• Tesla may face more pressure to prove its own artificial intelligence and robotaxi story.

• The main risk is not rockets. It is governance, focus and valuation discipline.

SpaceX has finally done what rockets are meant to do: it has lifted off. But the more interesting question for investors is not only what this means for SpaceX. It is what it means for Tesla.

On 12 June 2026, SpaceX made its public market debut after pricing its initial public offering at 135 USD per share. The stock closed its first session at 160.95 USD, up 19.2%. That is a strong start for the world’s most famous private space company. It also creates a new public scoreboard next to Tesla, another company closely tied to Elon Musk.

Tesla’s shares also rose that day, suggesting investors did not initially see SpaceX’s debut as a direct negative for the electric vehicle maker. But the bigger implication may unfold over months, not one trading day. Tesla is no longer the only easy public way to express faith in Musk’s long-term ambition. That changes the story.

The Musk premium now has a neighbour

For years, Tesla has been more than an electric car company in the eyes of many investors. It has also been a bet on software, batteries, energy storage, self-driving cars, robots and Musk’s ability to pull the future into the present.

SpaceX changes that. Investors now have a separate listed company tied to rockets, satellites, Starlink connectivity and space infrastructure. That gives the market a cleaner way to value two very different businesses.

This matters because part of Tesla’s valuation has long rested on belief. Not just belief in cars, but belief in optionality. Optionality means the chance that a company can create valuable new businesses over time. For Tesla, that includes autonomous driving, artificial intelligence, robotics and energy storage.

A public SpaceX may make investors ask a sharper question: which Musk company owns which part of the future? Tesla still owns its vehicles, battery platform, charging network, energy storage business and self-driving ambitions. But SpaceX now owns the more obvious “moonshot” narrative. Quite literally, in this case.

That does not hurt Tesla automatically. It may even help by forcing a clearer debate. A cleaner story can be useful. But it reduces the chance that investors simply treat Tesla as the default home for every Musk-related dream.

Tesla must win on Tesla terms

Tesla’s challenge is now more straightforward and more demanding. It needs to prove that its own growth story can stand without borrowed rocket fuel.

The company remains one of the most important players in electric vehicles, energy storage and artificial intelligence-linked transport. In the first quarter of 2026, Tesla produced over 408,000 vehicles, delivered over 358,000 vehicles and deployed 8.8 gigawatt hours of energy storage. That storage number matters because it shows Tesla is not only a car company. It is also building a power business.

But the market’s patience depends on delivery. Electric vehicle competition is tougher. Margins are watched closely. Robotaxi promises need evidence. Energy storage must keep scaling. Artificial intelligence spending must turn into products customers actually use and pay for.

SpaceX raises the bar because it gives investors another high-growth Musk company to compare against. If SpaceX shows faster revenue growth, clearer demand visibility through Starlink, or better execution under public scrutiny, Tesla may face a harder valuation conversation.

The positive side is also clear. Tesla could benefit from the broader attention. SpaceX’s listing keeps the Musk ecosystem in the spotlight. It may also remind investors that ambitious founder-led companies can create new markets, not only compete inside old ones.

Still, Tesla shareholders own Tesla. They do not own SpaceX unless they buy SpaceX separately. That sounds obvious, but markets sometimes need obvious things written in large font.

The real issue is governance, not gravity

The most important implication may be governance. Governance simply means how a company is run, who makes decisions and whether all shareholders are treated fairly.

Tesla, SpaceX and xAI sit inside a wider Musk ecosystem. That ecosystem may create useful links. Tesla could benefit from artificial intelligence talent, computing infrastructure, satellite connectivity or engineering know-how across companies. In theory, that is powerful.

In practice, it can also become messy. Investors will watch related-party deals, talent movement, capital allocation and management attention. If Tesla shareholders feel their company is funding or supporting projects that mainly benefit another Musk-controlled business, the market may apply a discount.

There is also the focus question. Tesla is trying to solve several hard problems at once: electric vehicles, self-driving software, humanoid robots, energy storage and manufacturing scale. SpaceX is now a public company with its own investors, its own quarterly pressures and its own huge ambitions. One person can have many ideas. The week still has only seven days.

Investor playbook: what to watch next

• Watch whether Tesla’s robotaxi and artificial intelligence milestones become more concrete, not just more exciting.
• Track Tesla vehicle margins and energy storage growth to see whether the core business supports the valuation.
• Follow any Tesla, SpaceX or xAI transactions for signs of fair pricing and shareholder protection.
• Compare Tesla and SpaceX narratives separately. A good story in one does not automatically pay the bills in the other.

Risks: the shine can cut both ways

The first risk is attention. If SpaceX becomes the new market darling, some retail and institutional investors may rotate away from Tesla. That does not mean Tesla’s business weakens, but share prices often react to flows before fundamentals catch up.

The second risk is valuation. Tesla already trades on large future expectations. If investors now compare it with a newly listed SpaceX, they may become less willing to pay for distant promises without visible milestones.

The third risk is complexity. The more connected the Musk ecosystem becomes, the more investors will demand transparency. Clear boundaries matter. Without them, the market may start charging Tesla a “complicated family dinner” discount.

The mirror is now in orbit

SpaceX’s initial public offering does not make Tesla weaker overnight. It does something more subtle. It gives investors a mirror. Tesla now has to show which parts of its valuation come from cars, batteries, software and energy, and which parts come from the wider Musk aura. That is healthy, but not comfortable.

For investors, the key is to separate admiration from ownership. SpaceX may be the louder launch this week, but Tesla’s real test remains on the ground: turning big promises into products, profits and trust. Rockets can escape gravity. Valuations cannot.

This material is marketing content and should not be regarded as investment advice. Trading financial instruments carries risks and historic performance is not a guarantee of future results.

The instrument(s) referenced in this content may be issued by a partner, from whom Saxo receives promotional fees, payment or retrocessions. While Saxo may receive compensation from these partnerships, all content is created with the aim of providing clients with valuable information and options.