Precious metals, real diversification

Key takeaways

• Gold and silver lead 2025; platinum followed. Miners magnified gains
• Drivers: rate-cut bets, central-bank demand, silver’s industrial pull, tight supply
• Risks: jurisdiction, cost inflation, execution, and volatility

---

Why metals are moving now

Gold hit a record at USD 3,547, up 34% year to date. The bid reflects expected September Fed cuts, questions over Fed independence, and a more fractured world. With long-end yields high and the dollar soft, bonds lost defensive appeal, shifting flows toward safe-haven commodities. Risks, however, remain: a hawkish Fed pivot, a sharp dollar rebound, a drop in long yields, or a positioning unwind. For the full run-down of drivers and challenge points, read: Gold breaks to fresh record as investors seek alternatives in a fractured world | Saxo.

Silver finally cleared USD 40 for the first time since 2011. Platinum rallied through summer on China demand and supply discipline. For more, see: Silver powers past USD 40 to 14-year highs | Saxo.  The common thread: softer real-rate expectations, steady central-bank buying, and silver’s tight balance from solar and electronics.

Many portfolios still underweight miners. Miners turn metal moves into larger earnings swings—bigger ups and sharper downs—unlike bullion. The opportunity sits between macro hedging and equity upside, provided investors accept the risk stack: costs, politics, and project execution.

Under the bonnet: what’s driving strength

Real rates set the tone. When expected real yields fall, gold’s opportunity cost drops and demand improves. That bid often spills into silver and, with leverage, into miners. On fundamentals, silver’s industrial demand remains firm—photovoltaics, power electronics, and sensing—while mine supply grow slowly. Platinum has rebounded enough to lift many operations back above cash costs, but not enough to trigger new capacity. That supports prices.

Positioning then did the rest: with few bulls on and tight physical markets, even modest buying pushed prices through resistance. When metal prices rise, miner shares often rise more because costs move slower than prices, so profits swing harder. Read more in Ole Hansen’s latest COT note, COT report: Modest gold and silver longs fuel breakout momentum | Saxo.

Know your levers: costs, gearing, ballast

AISC 101. All-in sustaining cost (AISC) wraps cash costs with sustaining capex and overhead. When prices outrun AISC, cash flow compounds fast—until it doesn’t. That is the essence of miner torque, earnings sensitivity to metal prices because costs move slower than prices.

Gearing 101. Gearing = financial leverage. Debt magnifies equity swings. Fixed interest costs make profits rise faster in upcycles—and fall harder in downcycles. In miners you get two levers: operating leverage (AISC vs price) and financial leverage (debt). Watch net debt/EBITDA, interest cover, maturity walls, and floating vs fixed rates. Low gearing cushions volatility; high gearing boosts “torque” but raises covenant and refinancing risk.

Metal ballast 101. “Ballast” = a stabiliser in a portfolio. Gold—and sometimes silver—tends to move differently from equities in stress. It pays no yield, so the “cost” is the foregone real return elsewhere. When real yields fall or the dollar softens, ballast strengthens. In policy or geopolitical shocks, bullion often falls less or even rises. That steadies total returns and gives you dry powder to rebalance.

Execution counts: cost discipline in focus

A strong tape rewards operators that keep costs in line:

• Agnico Eagle (AEM): record free cash flow, net cash, and reiterated 2025 cost and capex guidance.
• Pan American Silver (PAAS): dividend raised; still on track to meet 2025 production and cost guidance.
• Alamos Gold (AGI): sequential declines in cash costs and AISC drove record operating cash flow.
• Fresnillo (FRES LN): adjusted production costs fell about 20% year-on-year in H1; management flagged “rigorous cost discipline.”
• Impala Platinum (IMP SJ): reinstated a dividend and cut capex, signaling capital discipline as prices recovered.
• Valterra Platinum (VAL SJ): the Anglo American spin-out kept unit-cost focus and avoided aggressive growth despite the rally.

These are examples, not endorsements. Always re-underwrite mine-by-mine cost curves and jurisdiction risk.

What to watch

Macro: The Fed decision on 17 September 2025 and the path of real yields—gold’s primary headwind or tailwind.
Micro: Q3 production updates from large gold, silver, and platinum (PGM) producers—watch grades, AISC, and sustaining capex.
Physical: Silver’s supply-demand updates and PV installation trends, including any “thrifting” of silver loadings.
Policy: Signals on Mexico’s permitting regime and South Africa’s power stabilisation—risk premia can change quickly.

The risk map: where it can bite

Country risk is real. Mexico tightened the mining regime in recent years, lengthening permitting and adding uncertainty for silver-heavy portfolios. Peru’s periodic unrest can clog logistics. In South Africa, platinum-group miners remain exposed to power reliability and policy shifts.

Cost inflation persists in energy, labor, and consumables; it usually falls slower than metal prices in a pullback. Financing risk matters too. If prices wobble, equity and debt windows narrow fast for single-asset developers. The punchline: miners add diversification across macro factors, but concentration in a few countries can compound shocks.

Access points: metals vs miners

You can own the metals for stability or the miners to magnify moves. Pairing both can smooth the ride.

• GDX (gold miners ETF)
• SIL (silver miners ETF)
  
  Check fund factsheets for fees, holdings, and jurisdiction mix.
  
  

  
  Bar chart comparing YTD returns of gold/silver/platinum vs their miners